After reading Jón Gnarr’s memoir, Gnarr!, I was struck by his focus on leading by example - his confidence
in comedy’s power to change the world for the better and his belief that we
should encourage others by our actions.
During his campaign, many Icelandic career politicians essentially blew
him off, and even during his term as mayor, foreign politicians weren’t quite
sure how to handle him – all because he challenged and rejected the traditional
hyper-masculine stereotypes of politicians as sharp-witted, calculating, and
prepared for anything. Rather than
playing by the rules of the political structure, he chose instead to
deconstruct it by operating outside its confines, thereby revealing its
inherent flaws and weaknesses, like a “virus” (Gnarr, p. 168). Rather than being an armchair activist, he
chose to do something about the issues he saw, and thereby inspire others to
have the confidence to do the (seemingly) impossible.
So what does this mean for philanthropists? For me, it means that you should never be
afraid to challenge a system you see as corrupt, even a philanthropic one. Do you have an issue with the way a charity
handles its use of funds? Call them out
on it. Propose a restructuring of their
finances. And if that doesn’t work? Start your own philanthropic endeavor and do
a better job. Sometimes, as Gnarr
pointed out, a system is too sick to be saved; it has to be killed off to make
room for a superior one. Simply saying
that the system is bad isn’t enough – you have to work to ameliorate it.
What does that take?
For Gnarr, it requires humor, positivity, and adaptability. Facing the looming challenge of confronting
the system can be nerve-wracking and depressing, a seemingly insurmountable
task – it certainly appeared that way to Iceland after the political and
financial meltdown that ushered in Gnarr’s term. But for Gnarr and his Best Party, this was a
chance to take a step back and approach the situation from a totally fresh
perspective. Using ingenuity and most of
all, positivity, we can effect real change.
We as leaders have a duty to inspire people and to make civic engagement
fun. People want to enjoy themselves,
and they ought to; it’s a natural human desire to be happy, so why present
civic engagement as deathly serious? Why
can’t we make a difference and have a good time doing it?
A leader, by definition, guides people. Some leaders do it through words. Better ones do it through actions. And great ones – great ones not only lead by
example, they make you have such a good time you want to keep coming back. People are more invested in the things they
enjoy, it’s as simple as that.
Positivity, humor, and imagination: with these we can change the
world. But we have to be willing to use
them. Don’t be afraid to think outside
the limitations our society has imposed upon us.
What does it mean to be a change-maker? It means thinking creatively. It means inspiring others with your passion
and positivity. It means being bold,
being daring. Don’t settle for what we
already if what we already have isn’t working – create something better. Step outside the bounds. Color outside the lines. Make change.
Hi Eliza,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your definitions of leaders and change-makers and enjoyed how you incorporated Gnarr into your analysis. I think sometimes people confuse managers and leaders. Managers make sure that everyone is doing the job but leaders inspire people to do the job. In practicality, it is best to have both.
Your perspectives on changing making really reflects the people we have studied in class. They were creative, bold and passionate. The passion set them apart from the "regular" people and pushed them to continue making change. Gnarr was an unconventional change-maker and leader. His wit and candidness was a breakaway from what the Icelandic citizens were used to seeing in a leader; thus he became very memorable.
Hi Eliza,
ReplyDeleteI really like how you view this topic in such a creative way and try to sway from the stereotypical views of how "service should be this way or that way." I agree that while we are serving there should be enjoyment in what you are doing and it should result in just as meaningful results because when one is happy with what they are doing they typically put in more work. I find Gnarr extremely interesting and may look into reading his memoir because I am still not 100% sold with how he pulled this off and how he was able to actually make a positive difference. You are right that he didn't "play by the rules of political structure" but that is why he was so successful. When things aren't working out, we need to step in and change things and sometimes they are as large as looking at something in a completely new way. Leaders should want to inspire people and I think you did a good job explaining how there are ways of doing this that aren't necessarily traditional.
ReplyDeleteEliza,
Just as a side note, I love your analogy and approach on creative civic engagement as this idea of “coloring outside the lines”- it’s really creative in itself- I completely agree with your distinctions of what a leader is and his/her outlook on situations. I especially like how you tied in Gnarr and used him as a way to show that there isn’t one cookie cutter way for making change. I believe that this could have easily been written on any other of the memoirs we discussed in class, as each change-maker in a sense took their own creative approach toward civic engagement. For Gnarr as you mentioned it was his comedic background, for Williams it was her adaptability, for Boyle it was his religion and for Malala it was her bravery under her dangerous curcumstances. All in all I think it is important to use these role models as inspiration towards discovering how you can creatively be a leader and make a difference. What’s your creative outlook?
Hi Claire,
DeleteThanks for your comment! To directly answer your question in terms of my own creative outlook towards philanthropy, I think it has a lot to do with listening. Listening to what people feel they want and need is one of the best ways to help them. So often, we in a position of "power" think we know what's best for people - consider the "white man's burden" of colonialism, which sought to eradicate native cultures because "civilized" European society was thought to be better for everyone. Consider also international aid, and how aid workers sometimes don't truly understand the cultures they're trying to ameliorate. When you listen to people, you not only gain a better understanding of them, you gain compassion. Recognizing our shared humanity helps us help others.
Eliza,
ReplyDeleteYou have wonderfully addressed how making change in an effective way doesn’t always have to be the traditional way or conforming to the norms of society. I agree that it is very important for people who have strong beliefs or convictions towards how certain issues are handled to lead by example. Only through their actions can other people be given a sense of what pressing issues are at hand and it also demonstrates who truly care about making a positive change in the world. Many of the memoirs we read in class deal with ordinary figures who managed to make a significant change in a creative way because they enjoyed what they were doing. I read Greg Boyle’s memoir that dealt with him helping gang-related youths escape the violent gang life and find their way back into society. He was able to carry out his mission of helping the youth by talking to them up front when no one else would. Many people thought these kids were hopeless and were a lost cause but Greg Boyle never gave up on them because of his love for helping the youth find their place in society. This passion for doing what you love or enjoy is what is common with many influential change makers.
Eliza,
ReplyDeleteI think that you made so many awesome points in this post. Jon Gnarr is such an interesting person and I think there was really a lot to learn from him. I think he showed how to make changes by being proactive and how important it is to be creative with your work. I also think a big lesson Gnarr taught how important it is not to be afraid to be wrong and admit your mistakes. No one knows for sure if their ideas are going to work or not, but being able to make changes as you go is an important quality in a leader.
I also think Gnarr was a great example of someone who used their talents to try to make the changes they wanted to see. As you said, he was good at comedy and found power in its use. We can’t all be great at everything, but I think Gnarr showed how you can use so many different talents to reach the same goals. Some people know how to use comedy in the right ways, others use their understanding of science to make changes, some use their writing skills to present their ideas, and the list could go on. I think its less intimidating as a “change maker” to know that there is not one right way to go about doing what you want.